Skip to main content
WIL · Methodology Registry

Methodology Registry

Transparent documentation of all analytical frameworks used in WIL research. Each methodology includes purpose, variables, data sources, weighting approach, version history, and validation status.

18Registered frameworksActive methodologies
4ValidatedProduction-grade
14Beta / ExperimentalUnder validation
v2.1Latest WEICurrent release
Purpose: Analytical transparency for institutional usersMaturity levels: Experimental · Beta · Validated · InstitutionalReview: Versioned with advisory panel oversight

Registered methodologies

WEIValidated

Workforce Exposure Index™

Five-component composite index measuring operational workforce constraint across U.S. construction markets at state resolution.

v2.1Validated
CVFValidated

Compensation Volatility Framework™

Tracks compensation movement, regional spread, and directional trend for core construction execution roles.

v1.2Validated
PERMBeta

Project Execution Risk Matrix™

Maps workforce risk across project execution dimensions — role criticality, market depth, replacement velocity, and compensation volatility.

v1.0Beta
DCPBeta

Data Center Pipeline™

Tracks verified hyperscale and colocation data-center construction as a leading indicator of electrical and mechanical labor demand.

v1.0Beta
CGCIExperimental

CHIPS-Grid Collision Index™

Composite index reading concurrent semiconductor fab and grid build-out as a directional labor collision signal.

v1.1Experimental
WPIBeta

Workforce Pressure Index™

Company-level composite measuring construction workforce execution pressure from operational footprint, backlog trajectory, hiring velocity, trade mix, and ownership structure.

v1.0Beta
WAFInstitutional

Workforce Assessment Framework™

The parent methodology of the Workforce Intelligence Lab — a single, decision-ready composite integrating capacity, availability, execution risk, feasibility, and the established WEI™, CVF™, and PERM™ indices.

v1.0Institutional
WCIBeta

Workforce Capacity Index™

Whether a contractor or market has the leadership and field capacity to scale into new backlog — bench depth, succession exposure, and staffing bandwidth.

v1.0Beta
LASBeta

Labor Availability Score™

How many genuinely available, qualified operators sit within reach of a role and market — including reachability and rarity of active search.

v1.0Beta
WERMBeta

Workforce Execution Risk Model™

How workforce gaps translate into schedule slippage, quality exposure, cost pressure, and single points of failure on a project or portfolio.

v1.0Beta
WFFBeta

Workforce Feasibility Framework™

A go / no-go labor lens — whether a planned project, award, or expansion can actually be staffed in the target market and timeline.

v1.0Beta
CPSIValidated

Construction Position Scarcity Index™

Role-level scarcity scoring for construction leadership positions — PM, estimator, superintendent, and commissioning — by market and discipline.

v1.0Validated
OCMExperimental

Offer Competitiveness Matrix™

Scores whether a specific offer will close across nine conversion dimensions candidates weigh before they accept — the tactical counterpart to macro labor vulnerability reads.

v1.0Experimental
WSFExperimental

Workforce Stability Framework™

Retention pressure, compensation volatility, hiring consistency, and regional labor durability — recurring stability reads inside dashboards and regional analysis.

v1.0Experimental
CCSExperimental

Contractor Capacity Signal™

Workforce scalability, project staffing capability, labor depth, and execution bandwidth for contractor benchmarking.

v1.0Experimental
PMACExperimental

PM Availability Curve™

PM scarcity, regional availability, compensation acceleration, and hiring competition — the role-specific curve behind PM market analysis.

v1.0Experimental
WSIExperimental

Workforce Scarcity Indicators™

Supply tightness, demand pressure, and reachability of qualified operators by role and region.

v1.0Experimental
WVMExperimental

Workforce Volatility Monitor™

Labor instability, compensation swings, workforce disruption, and hiring unpredictability for operational risk discussions.

v1.0Experimental

Registry scope

The methodology registry documents analytical frameworks — not operational tools or hiring systems. Each entry specifies the research question it answers, the variables it uses, and its validation status. For general methodology notes and confidence framing, see Methodology & Confidence Notes.