Skip to main content
Construction Compensation Snapshot
  1. Headline read
  2. Project Manager
  3. Estimator
  4. Project Engineer
  5. Superintendent
  6. Cross-role observations
  7. Methodology & sources
WIL · Compensation

Construction Compensation Snapshot

National compensation visibility for the core construction execution roles — project leadership, estimating, field supervision, and project engineering. Framed in regional positioning rather than precise spot wages.

4Role groupsCore execution roles
~$115kPM median bandNational anchor
+35%Widest premiumTop-state spread
2026-06Updatedv2
SourcesBLS OEWS
Operational · BLS direct
Methodology: v2Last updated: 2026-06-01

Headline read

National median compensation for construction project leadership sits in the low-to-mid six figures, with material regional premiums concentrated in coastal metros — most notably the Northeast corridor and California. Field supervision and estimating tracks somewhat lower nationally but exhibits similar regional dispersion. Project engineering carries a consistent technical premium across most large markets.

Regional wage spread vs. national median · % over / under national, 5-pt bins
Project Manager
Estimator
Project Engineer
Superintendent
Bars span the lowest- to highest-paying tracked state markets for each role, positioned against the national median. Directional 5-point bins — regional positioning, not construction-only spot wages.

Project Manager

National median
~$115k
Top-state position
+35% vs nat'l
Lowest-state position
-25% vs nat'l
Range character
material premium → discount

Highest-paying state markets for this role include NY, WA, MA, NJ. Lower-cost markets currently include AR, WY, WV. Regional positioning here is intended as a benchmark anchor; the published medians reflect cross-industry OEWS reporting, not construction-only segmentation. Top-state position reads as material premium over national medians.

Estimator

National median
~$80k
Top-state position
+30% vs nat'l
Lowest-state position
-20% vs nat'l
Range character
material premium → discount

Highest-paying state markets for this role include MA, WY, CO, WA. Lower-cost markets currently include AR, NM, OK. Regional positioning here is intended as a benchmark anchor; the published medians reflect cross-industry OEWS reporting, not construction-only segmentation. Top-state position reads as material premium over national medians.

Project Engineer

National median
~$100k
Top-state position
+20% vs nat'l
Lowest-state position
-15% vs nat'l
Range character
material premium → discount

Highest-paying state markets for this role include CA, WA, MA, LA. Lower-cost markets currently include GA, AR, WV. Regional positioning here is intended as a benchmark anchor; the published medians reflect cross-industry OEWS reporting, not construction-only segmentation. Top-state position reads as material premium over national medians.

Superintendent

National median
~$80k
Top-state position
+35% vs nat'l
Lowest-state position
-25% vs nat'l
Range character
material premium → discount

Highest-paying state markets for this role include WA, IL, NJ, OR. Lower-cost markets currently include AR, AL, MS. Regional positioning here is intended as a benchmark anchor; the published medians reflect cross-industry OEWS reporting, not construction-only segmentation. Top-state position reads as material premium over national medians.

Cross-role observations

  • Coastal premium persists. Northeast and West Coast metros carry meaningful compensation premiums across all four roles, reflecting cost-of-living and talent-density dynamics.
  • Field supervision spread is widest. The regional gap between top and bottom state medians is largest for Superintendents / Foremen — implying greater portability of total compensation expectations.
  • Project engineering runs flatter. Civil-engineering wage dispersion is narrower nationally; technical specialization compresses regional spread.
AlphaHire's internal compensation layer resolves to construction segment and metro level, and overlays offer-acceptance and counter-offer dynamics from active recruiting work. The published snapshot is restrained to OEWS-derived state-level framing.
For role-, metro-, or segment-specific compensation benchmarks, or live offer-acceptance reads, contact the research team: research@alpha-hire.com.

Methodology & sources

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS). State medians are compared against the national median for the same SOC code; positioning is expressed in directional ranges. Published wage figures are rounded to the nearest $5,000 to avoid overprecise framing. Percent-over-national values are rounded to 5% bins. Note that OEWS reports cross-industry medians — construction-only segmentation is not separately published at the state level. See the methodology page for confidence and limitations. Operational, directional read — not a forecast. Tiers, not scores. Ranges, not spot figures.