Skip to main content
On this page
  1. Headline read
  2. Market position
  3. Construction context
  4. Workforce planning
  5. Methodology & sources
WIL · State Market Brief

Kansas — Construction Workforce

A directional, operational read of the Kansas construction labor market — exposure tier, employment scale, wage positioning, and trend orientation. For executive workforce-planning visibility.

SourcesBLS OEWSBLS QCEWU.S. Treasury USAspending
Operational · directional
Period: 2025-Q3Methodology: v2Last updated: 2026-05-26

Headline read

The Kansas construction labor market currently registers moderate operational exposure. Employment scale is smaller (below ~100k), with the trend expanding over the most recent reporting window. Senior construction compensation in Kansas is modestly above national medians.

Market position

Exposure tier
Moderate
Employment scale
smaller
Employment trend
expanding
Wage position
modest premium
Kansas — workforce exposure tier
Senior construction wage position vs. national
Below nationalIn linePremium
Modestly above national medians

Where Kansas sits nationally

HighElevatedModerateLowNot tracked
AK
MEModerateWAModerateMTModerateNDModerateMNModerateWIModerateMIModerateVTLowNHModerateORModerateIDModerateWYLowSDLowIAModerateILModerateINModerateOHModeratePAModerateNYModerateMALowCAModerateNVModerateUTModerateCOModerateNEModerateMOLowKYLowWVModerateVAModerateMDModerateNJModerateCTModerateAZModerateNMModerateKSModerateARLowTNModerateNCModerateSCModerateDELowRILowOKModerateLAModerateMSModerateALModerateGAModerateDCLowTXElevatedFLModerate
HI

Construction-relevant context

Kansas sits in a moderate operational tier across the published components of the Workforce Exposure framework: compensation pressure, labor-supply constraint, demand trajectory, and contractor concentration. Federal contract-award activity is folded in as a leading execution-intensity signal. As with all operational reads, the framing is intended for workforce planning and execution-risk visibility — not a deterministic labor forecast.

The published brief reflects state-level aggregates. AlphaHire's internal layer resolves to construction segment (commercial, civil, mechanical, electrical, industrial), role group (project management, estimating, field supervision, project engineering), and individual contractor-level execution-risk reads.

What this means for workforce planning

  • Talent acquisition posture: Candidate availability is workable but tightening in pockets aligned with award-driven execution ramps. Monitor compensation creep on critical roles.
  • Compensation visibility: Kansas runs modestly above national medians; expect small upward adjustments on offers vs. benchmark.
  • Demand orientation: Employment is expanding across the most recent reporting window — a directional signal of near-term hiring intent and contractor backlog pressure.
For role-level and segment-level workforce intelligence specific to Kansas — or for a confidential briefing on contractor-level execution risk — contact the research team: research@alpha-hire.com.

Methodology & sources

Sources: BLS OEWS, BLS QCEW, U.S. Treasury USAspending. The exposure framework integrates these into a single operational tier per state. Methodology version v2; see the methodology page for component definitions and confidence handling. Briefs are refreshed on the underlying source cadence. Operational, directional read — not a forecast. Tiers, not scores. Ranges, not spot figures.