WIL · Methodology Registry

Methodology Registry

Each WIL methodology as a structured, versioned record — what it measures, its inputs and assumptions, its current validation status and limitations, its version history, and the published records that apply it. Methodologies are testable claims, retained, revised, or retired on evidence.

Framework release WIL-2026.1; per-methodology versions track each index independently. Banded, directional reads — not forecasts. No model weights, raw data, or downloadable artifacts are exposed. See Methodology for the narrative framework and About the Lab for the validation framework and governance.

5
Methodologies
2
In active use
WIL-2026.1
Framework version
Quarterly
Review cadence
WAIUnder revision

Workforce Availability Index™

WIL-MTH-WAI · v1.0 · Reviewed Q2 2026

Skilled-labor availability in an occupation and region relative to projected demand.

View record →
WCIUnder revision

Workforce Capacity Index™

WIL-MTH-WCI · v1.0 · Reviewed Q2 2026

Capacity of a regional or sectoral workforce to absorb additional projects without exceeding labor supply.

View record →
WEIActive

Workforce Exposure Index™

WIL-MTH-WEI · v2.1 · Reviewed Q2 2026

Operational workforce-execution constraint, banded by market, role, or portfolio.

View record →
CVFActive

Compensation Volatility Framework™

WIL-MTH-CVF · v1.2 · Reviewed Q2 2026

Instability in compensation for skilled occupations across regions and over time.

View record →
PERMUnder revision

Project Execution Risk Matrix™

WIL-MTH-PERM · v1.0 · Reviewed Q2 2026

Linkage of workforce constraints to project-execution risk, in a structured, comparable form.

View record →
WAI

Workforce Availability Index™

Under revisionVersion 1.0 · Reviewed Q2 2026 · WIL-MTH-WAI

Skilled-labor availability in an occupation and region relative to projected demand.

Primary question
Is the labor required to staff projected work present?
Source families
BLS (employment & occupational) · Apprenticeship & training records · Announced project pipelines
Inputs
Public employment and occupational data; apprenticeship and training records; announced project pipelines.
Assumptions
Occupational categories are comparable across sources; announced demand approximates realized demand within stated bounds.
Validation status
Back-testing against historical staffing outcomes and cross-region replication; predictive validity to be determined.
Limitations
Sensitive to the quality of demand estimates; less reliable where occupational definitions are coarse or data are sparse.

Version history

  • v1.0 · 2026 Q2Initial specification; validation in progress.

Publications using this method

Foundational measure — feeds the exposure and execution-risk methodologies; no standalone published application yet.

Cite as

AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab. (2026). Workforce Availability Index™ (Methodology WIL-MTH-WAI, Version 1.0). WIL Methodology Registry.

Permalinkhttps://library.alpha-hire.com/library/methodology/registry#wai
WCI

Workforce Capacity Index™

Under revisionVersion 1.0 · Reviewed Q2 2026 · WIL-MTH-WCI

Capacity of a regional or sectoral workforce to absorb additional projects without exceeding labor supply.

Primary question
Can the workforce absorb new demand?
Source families
Workforce stocks & flows · Utilization indicators · Skilled-labor migration
Inputs
Workforce stocks and flows; utilization indicators; in- and out-migration of skilled labor.
Assumptions
Capacity scales with measurable workforce stocks and mobility; short-run training response is bounded.
Validation status
Comparison of index levels against observed delay and overtime indicators; sensitivity testing of mobility assumptions.
Limitations
Does not capture informal or undocumented labor flows; mobility estimates carry material uncertainty.

Version history

  • v1.0 · 2026 Q2Initial specification; validation in progress.

Publications using this method

Foundational measure — feeds the exposure and execution-risk methodologies; no standalone published application yet.

Cite as

AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab. (2026). Workforce Capacity Index™ (Methodology WIL-MTH-WCI, Version 1.0). WIL Methodology Registry.

Permalinkhttps://library.alpha-hire.com/library/methodology/registry#wci
WEI

Workforce Exposure Index™

ActiveVersion 2.1 · Reviewed Q2 2026 · WIL-MTH-WEI

Operational workforce-execution constraint, banded by market, role, or portfolio.

Primary question
How exposed is delivery to workforce-related risk?
Source families
BLS OEWS · BLS QCEW · USAspending · State contractor registries · AlphaHire pipeline
Inputs
Compensation pressure (OEWS), labor-supply constraint (QCEW employment trend), demand pressure (posting-volume proxy), contractor concentration (license-registry depth), and federal-award activity (USAspending).
Assumptions
Exposure rises with reliance on constrained occupations and with concentration of demand in time and place; components are comparable after normalization and banding.
Validation status
Validated against 2023–2025 market-stress events; quarterly back-testing against BLS revisions; reliability checks across analysts.
Limitations
An indicator of exposure, not a forecast of failure; depends on the validity of its component measures; banded — not a precise score.

Version history

  • v1.0 · 2024 Q4Initial three-component index.
  • v2.0 · 2025 Q2Added contractor concentration and federal-award activity components.
  • v2.1 · 2026 Q2Refined tier thresholds; added confidence framing.
Cite as

AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab. (2026). Workforce Exposure Index™ (Methodology WIL-MTH-WEI, Version 2.1). WIL Methodology Registry.

Permalinkhttps://library.alpha-hire.com/library/methodology/registry#wei
CVF

Compensation Volatility Framework™

ActiveVersion 1.2 · Reviewed Q2 2026 · WIL-MTH-CVF

Instability in compensation for skilled occupations across regions and over time.

Primary question
How stable is the price of labor?
Source families
BLS OEWS · BLS QCEW (context)
Inputs
National median wage (OEWS); regional wage spread (state vs. national); directional year-over-year trend band; role-family segmentation.
Assumptions
Reported compensation reflects market conditions with a stated lag; series are comparable after adjustment.
Validation status
Validated against BLS annual revisions; cross-checked with state wage surveys; sensitivity testing of adjustment choices.
Limitations
Lagged and incomplete coverage of fast-moving markets; benefits and informal pay imperfectly observed.

Version history

  • v1.0 · 2025 Q1Initial role-family medians.
  • v1.2 · 2026 Q2Added directional trend bands and regional spread.
Cite as

AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab. (2026). Compensation Volatility Framework™ (Methodology WIL-MTH-CVF, Version 1.2). WIL Methodology Registry.

Permalinkhttps://library.alpha-hire.com/library/methodology/registry#cvf
PERM

Project Execution Risk Matrix™

Under revisionVersion 1.0 · Reviewed Q2 2026 · WIL-MTH-PERM

Linkage of workforce constraints to project-execution risk, in a structured, comparable form.

Primary question
How do labor constraints translate into delivery risk?
Source families
WEI output · CVF output · Role-demand signals · Mission-critical role taxonomy
Inputs
Outputs of the availability, capacity, and exposure measures; project scope, schedule, and location attributes.
Assumptions
Execution risk can be approximated by combining workforce measures with project characteristics.
Validation status
Beta — retrospective comparison against documented execution outcomes; classification-stability review in progress.
Limitations
A decision-support structure rather than a probabilistic model; inherits the limits of its inputs.

Version history

  • v1.0 · 2025 Q4Initial four-dimension matrix.

Publications using this method

Cite as

AlphaHire Workforce Intelligence Lab. (2026). Project Execution Risk Matrix™ (Methodology WIL-MTH-PERM, Version 1.0). WIL Methodology Registry.

Permalinkhttps://library.alpha-hire.com/library/methodology/registry#perm

Lifecycle statuses: Active (in use, meeting validation thresholds), Under revision (retained provisionally while weaknesses are addressed), Retired (withdrawn). Validation is continuous; negative results are documented rather than suppressed.